Archive for November, 2011

Smoking in cars

November 18th, 2011

There has been a bit of a furore over the last couple of days in the U.K.

The British Medical Association wants smoking banned in all cars.

There are so many things that are wrong about this that I’m not sure where to start.

First of all, the figures used by the BMA [supposedly the medical authority] that smoke in cars is 23 times stronger that the levels found in a smoky pub are based on nothing more than junk science and have actually been retracted in a very quiet press release.  Of course the damage is done now and the Antis are gleefully quoting the original figure.

All that apart, I would ask what right anyone has to dictate what I do in my car?  Maybe an argument could be made for not smoking in a car with children present but what about when I am the only occupant?  Are they claiming that my smoking produces second hand smoke that may kill me?  My car is my own space.  I paid heavily for the car and each year I pay heavily for insurance, road tax and a car test.  Every time I pull into the pumps I give the government another great whack of my cash.  I pay dearly to run my car and no one is going to tell me what I can or cannot do in it.  As far as I am concerned, if I want to do something in my car that doesn’t affect the safety of my driving, I will do it.

There is not one single justification for this intrusion into privacy.  It is just another spiteful attempt to denormalise smokers and presumably to extort more money from them in fines.

You may wonder why I am so worked up about something that won’t affect me, but unfortunately Ireland seems to have signed up to the race to see who can produce the harshest anti-smoker regime.  What happens in the UK will inevitably happen here.

One aspect of this proposed ban which I haven’t seen mentioned is the effect of forcing drivers not to smoke.  Smoking has been proved to improve concentration, and also smokers find the odd cigarette to be soothing.  Both these benefits can only be an aid to driving.  Similarly, preventing someone from smoking can produce a shortness of temper and a distraction.

I would consider myself to be a reasonably good driver.  In the forty years I have been driving I have had many accidents – too many to count, but I was to blame in only one of those accidents when my brakes failed.  I consider myself to be a calm and considerate driver.  I may pass the odd comment when I witness bad driving but I’m not one to wave two fingers out the window or even to yell profanities.

Some years ago, I stopped smoking.  One of the things I noticed was the way my driving changed.  I admit that my driving became atrocious.  I became aggressive and angry, and shudder to think of the accidents that I very nearly caused.  There were a few reasons why I went back to smoking the pipe, and one of the major ones was because I literally terrified of my own driving.  Once I started smoking again, the old placid, considerate driver returned.

I would therefore make a simple prediction.  If this ban is imposed in the U.K. I predict that the accident rate is going to noticeably increase as will the incidents of “road rage”.

You have been warned.

-oOo-

This article also appears in Smoking out the Truth.

Where nothing happens

November 17th, 2011

Well, I must say I enjoyed my day off.

I must do it more often.

Maybe take an extra day off every week?  Or a couple of days?  Or seven days?

One of the problems I have is that nothing much happens here from one day to the next.  I therefore have little local news to regale you with.  I could write repeated and endless descriptions of Pullit pulling pints, but that would be monotonous.  I could amuse you all with Spanner’s futile attempts to get his leg over the yang wan in the grocery shop, but he would never forgive me, and I value his friendship. 

Life in the Manor isn’t much better, so that leaves me with very few subjects.  The only three that really get me worked up are the smoking bans, the EU and our useless fucking gubmint.  The problem here is that you are tired of hearing about them.  It has reached the stage where even oblique references brings forth moans from certain quarters.

I could invent stuff but that would be hard work and anyway I have always followed a policy of telling the truth, so that’s out.

It’s pissing down like incontinent elephants at the moment so I doubt I’ll get out and about today.  It’s also blowing half a gale so all in all, it ain’t very pretty out there.

So once again, I’ll probably have nothing to write about tomorrow.

No change there then.

Trapped

November 16th, 2011

According to the on-line listings, I apparently missed an interesting programme on 3e last night.

Bugger!

Grey days

November 16th, 2011

Didn’t get to sleep for ages last night.

Had a rough night even when I did get to sleep.

Foul form today.

Read the papers to cheer myself up.  Made me worse.

Decided that if I did write something today I would probably set the servers on fire.

It’s not even three but I had to switch on the fucking lights.

I think I’ll crack a bottle to cheer myself up.

Talk amongst yourselves.

If Hitler won the war

November 15th, 2011

Do you ever wonder what the world would be like if Hitler had won the last war?

It’s impossible to say precisely of course, but we can take a rough guess.

First of all, Hitler may have had some fairly weird ideas but he was no fool.  He wouldn’t have just created a vast Germany spreading across Europe.  That would be too difficult to control.  It would have made sense to leave each country as it was and even to allow democratic elections to keep the people mollified.  Needless to say, those democratically elected governments would have no say and would be mere puppets, with Berlin pulling the strings.  If the people elected someone who was opposed to Berlin, he would be quietly removed and replaced with a party lapdog.

Hitler, amongst other things was a health fanatic.  He believed in total abstinence from alcohol, was a vegetarian and had a hatred of smoking.  It is likely therefore that there would be a load of restrictions on what we ate or drank.  He couldn’t have banned alcohol or tobacco as that would have led to outright rebellion, but he would have imposed severe restrictions……

Hang on………

This is beginning to sound vaguely familiar?

« Prev - Next »