Head Rambles, the Book Buy the Book of the Blog
Order online here
Just quote the code 'auldfella' for a 10% discount

The ideal gift for the Auld Fella in your life
Latest news! The Book is now available in the States at Amazon.com

Archive for the 'Politics' Category

Sweeping things under the plywood

Grandad July 1st, 2009

I had to go into town today.

I was wandering around getting damp, as one does, when I saw I was about to pass a newsagent.

I have been in the shop before.  It’s a nice colourful place lined with magazines and sweets and things.

This time though there was a great big fuck-off sheet of plywood behind the counter that looked awful.

‘Aha!’ says I to myself.  ‘They have broken a window.’

But I immediately realised that there was no window there.  What had been there was the cigarette display.  And then I remembered.

The fucking Nanny State is at it again.

As and from today it is illegal to display cigarettes in shops.  Yes – it is against the law for anyone to see them!

A lot of people read this site.  Most come looking for a bit of pornography, or to find ways to remove a wasps nest, but that is beside the point.  The point is that with the number of visitors I get, I must have a fairly broad range of philosophies and ideologies.

At least one of you has to be a Neo-Nazi rabid anti-smoking fascist bastard, and I am appealing to you.

Yes, you [you miserable scum from the bottom of the cess pool].

Could you please tell me what the point of this latest law is?  I beg of you.  I really want to know.

Am I supposed to walk into a tobacconists and see an ugly sheet of plywood and say to myself ‘Oh shit! They don’t sell tobacco any more!’ and walk out avowing never to smoke again?

Do you seriously think that children walk into shops and are so overawed by the display of cigarettes that they have to buy them?

Please tell me, Arsehole. I really want to know.

And while you are at it, can you tell me why they aren’t bricking up the pubs so that children aren’t tempted by them?

Why aren’t cars sold with their doors welded shut so that boy racers can’t kill us?

What really riles me is the utter pettiness of this latest move.  It is a snide little dig that is going to do absolutely fuck all good except annoy people, and cost hard strapped shopkeepers more money that they can ill afford.

God give me strength!

Portugal can keep Lisbon

Grandad June 22nd, 2009

Here we go again.

Last year we held a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

It was a democratic election, and the result was a rejection.

Our dear government said they respected that, so what did they do?  They ignored the wishes of the people and are going for another referendum.

Once again, I will be voting NO, and here are my reasons -

The Lisbon Treaty is essentially a new European Constitution under a different name.  That Constitution was already rejected by France and Holland, but they are not allowed a vote this time around, therefore the process is undemocratic.

The Lisbon Treaty has already been rejected by the people of Ireland and the very act of running a second referendum is flying in the face of democracy.

Arsewipe Biffo reckons that he has addressed my concerns with guarantees.  Bollox.  He has the arrogance to assume he knows my concerns, and in fact has addressed none of them.  My concerns were nothing to do with neutrality, abortion or tax.  My concerns were about the whole democratic process, and by holding another referendum he is confirming my worst fears.

Of course all my original reasons for rejection still stand.

In 1973 I voted to join the European Economic Community.  I did not vote to join any political alliance that would try to dictate my laws, or interfere in any way [good or bad] in the running of my country.  It was a community to promote trade and to reduce barriers, which was a good thing.   The EEC became the EC without any vote or say on my part, and I resent that.  It is politics by the back door.

This treaty has to be passed by all governments in Europe.  It affects all countries.  Yet Ireland is the only country that is getting a vote.  Why?  If it is so damn good, why are they afraid to let the people have their say?  Because they know damn well that there isn’t a chance in hell that all countries would agree.  Again this flies in the face of every democratic principle.

Why does this constitution treaty have to be passed?  Because in their arrogance, they assumed we would all toe the line, and therefore they never even considered the possibility of a NO vote.  To present a treaty and then to tell us we have to vote YES is once again, arrogant and undemocratic.  It is making us all out to be sheep, and I resent that.

We are being told that this treaty is merely a tidying exercise, to make Brussels more democratic and accountable.  If that is all it is, then why is it so fucking important that it be passed?  I suspect, as do many others that there is far more to this treaty than they are saying.  They have already admitted that the text has been deliberately obfuscated, and refuse to simplify the thing.  I am deeply suspicious of this document and of the motives behind it.

Quite frankly, if this treaty were the best thing that ever happened to Ireland, I still maintain it should be rejected in the simple principle that democracy has been compromised, and the will of the people ignored.

Over the next four months we are going to be bombarded with propaganda, lies and threats. 

We are going to be told that we have to vote YES as there is no alternative.  My response to that is that they should have thought of an alternative in the first place.

We are going to be told that we cannot survive the current economic crisis without Europe.  This too is a load of bollox, as we are in Europe and rejection will not change that fact.

We are going to be told that a rejection will introduce a two tier system and that we will be on the periphery.  Again, this is a load of bollox.  Rejection of the treaty means it is dead.  It cannot be implemented so we all will be in the same boat.

We are going to hear mention of Iceland time and time again, which is a veiled threat and has no relevance to the treaty.

We are going to be cajoled by tales of ‘how good Europe has been to us’.  Yes.  It has been good, but are we supposed to renounce our democracy in a fit of obsequious gratitude?  Anyway, all the benefits we have accrued have been through economic ties and have nothing to do with the politics they are trying to sneak in by the back door.

We will be told that we will no longer be respected by Europe.  So fucking what?  If we have to tug the forelock just to curry favour then European Democracy is rotten to the core.  I am nailing my colours to the mast here, and doubtless will be lambasted for it. I don’t give a shite.  I have my principles, and I will not under any circumstances compromise my beliefs just to be popular.

For hundreds of years, Ireland lay under the yoke of foreign rule.  For those centuries, we told how to behave, how to speak and how to act.  Having finally shaken off that foreign rule, are we once again going to lie down, roll over and be ordered around by faceless bureaucrats abroad?

Where are the patriots when you fucking need them?

A cabal in our midst

Grandad June 17th, 2009

So our cosy cabal have done it again.

Our esteemed government have found that they can’t stop their pensions ‘for legal reasons’.

Here we have a shower of incompetents who for their own ends have screwed this country left right and centre, until it is on the verge of bankruptcy, and who still insist on paying themselves pensions while still in office and drawing a salary.

My old friend Bertie, who has enough questions hanging over his past to fuel an entire series of “Who wants to be a millionaire” is happily sitting there in the Dáil, doing fuck all and drawing a pension on top of his salary.  And how much is that pension?  A mere €111,235.

I would be happy to be drawing a pension of €111,235.  In fact, I would be happy to be drawing a pension based on a salary of €111,235.  But no.  I am a mere pleb and must make do with what I have.

Isn’t it amazing how laws can be changed overnight if the government so wishes?  Isn’t also amazing how laws suddenly appear out of the woodwork when there is a threat to the cabal’s income?  Isn’t is amazing how those laws can’t be changed overnight?

So Lenihan is reducing those pensions by 25%. 

BIG FUCKING DEAL.

Why not 100%, or even 50%?

Because the Attorney General says the ‘may be legal issues’.

Bollox.

Having had the greatest arse kicking in the history of the state, they still carry on feathering their own nests.

-oOo-

Incidentally, I found the following in Wikipedia -

A cabal is a number of people united in some close design, usually to promote their private views and interests in a church, state, or other community, often by intrigue. Cabals are sometimes secret societies composed of a few designing persons, and at other times are manifestations of emergent behaviour in society or governance on the part of a community of persons who have well established public affiliation or kinship. The term can also be used to refer to the designs of such persons or to the practical consequences of their emergent behaviour, and also holds a general meaning of intrigue and conspiracy.

I think it sums up that gang of bastards in the government very nicely?

Separated at birth?

Grandad June 6th, 2009

Is it just me or has anyone else noticed the resemblance?

There are slight differences though.

Tommy Cooper was a comic genius who rarely failed to make me laugh.  His death was a tragic loss.

Eamonn Ryan is just a grinning moron who just hasn’t got a fucking clue.  I wish he would crawl back under that rock from whence he came..

The Catholic Church in Ireland

Grandad May 27th, 2009

In 2002 the government signed into law one of the most underhanded corrupt acts in the history of the state.

The full ramifications of this act are only coming to light now with the publication of the Ryan Report on Institutional Child Abuse.

Much is being made in the media at the moment about the cap placed on the Church’s financial liability, and this indeed is a cause for great concern.  Through lying and conniving the Church has limited its liability to less than ten percent of the total cost.

There is a clause in the act though that causes me far more concern.

Under the terms of the act, Section 26, Paragraph 6 states that

A person shall not publish any information concerning an
application or an award made under this Act that refers to any other
person (including an applicant), relevant person or institution by
name or which could reasonably lead to the identification of any
other person (including an applicant), a relevant person or an institution
referred to in an application made under this Act.

In other words, no claimant may disclose the name of any abuser.

As I write, the government and the Church are ducking and weaving doing everything in their power to evade their responsibilities.  The government are refusing to review the act and are coming up with every excuse imaginable to let the Church off the hook, while in the meantime the Church is frantically shifting its assets and hiding behind every law and excuse that it can find.

I was led to understand that the law is there to protect the rights of the individual.  Here we have a law which not only removes rights from the individual but actually goes so far as to protect the guilty.  Under the terms of the act, it is extremely difficult to bring the guilty to justice.

It bears repeating here that we are not talking about petty crime here.  We are talking about paedophiles and sadists, who abused children systematically over a sixty year period.  These bastards raped and tortured, and in some cases killed children and are now being sheltered and protected by the so called ‘Catholic’ institutions.

If there is to be any justice, these criminals and those who shelter them should be dragged from wherever they are hiding, and they should face the full rigours of the law.  Age or infirmity should be no excuse.  Did they worry about the age or health of their victims?

If there is to be any closure for the victims, the institutions should feel the full wrath of the people of Ireland, and every last perpetrator should rot in prison.

-oOo-

Much was made yesterday of a clip on the Internet.  It is an extract from the RTE programme ‘Questions & Answers’.  I saw it go out on Monday night, and the following speech left me breathless.  It brought me to tears.  It is probably the most powerful broadcast I have ever seen.

If you haven’t already seen it, take a look.

And then tell me if the government or the Catholic Church have a shred of decency or morality left.

Pleased my arse

Grandad May 23rd, 2009

I am going to be ‘pleased in the long’ run am I?

Michael Woods was challenged yesterday to explain the appalling agreement made in 2002 whereby the religious institutions would only be liable for a maximum of €128 million in compensation to the victims of abuse.

At the time of this agreement the religious orders were well aware of the extent of the abuse but lied through their teeth about it.  The government were duped into believing that the numbers of victims were in the low hundreds, rather than high thousands.  They also cleverly played the poverty card and Woods and Ahern were conned into picking up the tab.  This tab now stands in excess of one billion.

If Woods had a shred of decency or honesty, he would have admitted that he was wrong.  But of course, we all know that a politician in this country can never ever admit that they made a mistake.

I was interested to hear what excuse he would come up with.  He was defending the indefensible, but Fianna Fáil are renowned for their ducking and diving.

Sure enough, Woods announced that ‘this generation of Irish people will be very pleased in the long run they they are the very ones who have at least done something to compensate the people`who were so badly treated’.

Holy shit!

Let’s examine this statement.

The abuse was carried out over decades by the religious institutions.  The government were aware of the abuse but did nothing.  So there are two parties to blame.  Seeing as it was the religious who were doing the abusing, they must take the majority of the blame.  If I were a judge, I would say they were at least 90% liable.  Instead of which, they have paid a mere 10% of the damages.

On the non-religious side, who were to blame?  Was it the people of Ireland?  No. Was it the department of education?  Yes.  So where is the compensation coming from?  The people of Ireland!

The government have a long standing failing in that they fail to realise that the money they spend does not belong to them.  It belongs to us.  Not too long ago, I passes a large sign at the side of a motorway announcing that it had been funded by the Irish government for the people of Ireland.  That is symptomatic of the arrogant attitude they have to our money.

So the people of Ireland are paying for the Department of Education’s mistakes?

I don’t begrudge the Survivors their compensation.  But again, Woods is overlooking a vital point.  I don’t think the Survivors are in this for monetary gain?  Correct me if I’m wrong, but I would say it is very important to the Survivors that the compensation is a means to penalise the transgressors.

If there were any justice in all of this, the religious institutions should pay 90% of the compensation, and the rest should be paid out of the party funds of whatever parties were in power during that period.

Of course the religious institutions are now pleading poverty.  The Christian Brothers have moved all their properties into the equivalent of an off-shore company.   If I owe the banks a debt, do they accept a plea of poverty?  No. Of course not.  They pursue me and sell everything I have until the debts are paid off.  And let’s not forget that the Vatican is complicit in all of this, and don’t try and tell me that they are broke?

Am I pleased in the long run?

Fuck you, Woods!

Next »

Who links to me