Grandad January 24th, 2012
It’s an interesting concept.
An organisation whose primary aim is supposed to be the health and welfare of the nation is forcing smokers not just to leave hospital buildings but is now forcing them out onto the road.
There is no logic behind this move, as even those who believe in the myth of Environmental Tobacco Smoke will have to admit that smoke outdoors poses no health risk whatsoever? Those same people will have to admit that standing by the side of a road in one’s pyjamas on a cold winter’s day is not exactly the healthiest of actions? Even some of the more enlightened members of the medical profession can see that.
I am no expert on the individual hospitals around the country, but amongst the hospitals I am familiar with, leaving the hospital grounds will bring you out to a very busy main road, or else there is one hell of a long walk to get to the perimeter of the grounds. Forcing either option is nothing short of dangerous and spiteful.
Of course, reading the first article above we find some telling pointers.
“The HSE’s director of public health policy, Dr Fenton Howell, who is a former chairman of Ash, the anti-smoking lobby group, …….”
So here we have The Righteous in plain view again. This is not about health – it is about a single minded obsession with beating down and humiliating smokers at every opportunity.
“He added: ‘We need to recognise that there is almost a sense that cigarettes are not as dangerous as they are. Five and a half thousand people die from tobacco every year, and there are thousands admitted to hospital beds because of their addiction.’”
At least he is beginning to get the message. Cigarettes are not the equivalent of a loaded gun. What he is really saying here is that people are starting to think that cigarettes are not as dangerous as ASH claim they are. And then he plays ASH’s favourite game of plucking figures out of the air. There is nothing like a spot of emotive figure-juggling!
“We can’t manage patients by letting them continue the thing that brought them into hospital in the first place.”
OK. Apply that to the few cases where you genuinely think that smoking may have contributed to the problem, but then you also have to force all victims of sports injuries to renounce sport for life. All road accident injuries must have their driving licence immediately revoked, or they must be banned from the pavements. Patent rubbish.
Probably the most telling statement in the article is near the top -
“The introduction of the smoking ban is being staggered so professionals within the hospital can get sufficient training in smoking cessation therapies such as nicotine patches and gum.”
There couldn’t possibly be a connection between between the fact that the anti-smoking lobby are so heavily funded by Pharma, and the promotion of Pharma products that have been proven to be useless?
Could there?
Subscribe to audio
